Why is healthcare not a right?
Why is it a right to bare arms yet if you are wounded by a gun you don’t have the right to healthcare to save your life.
Why is it that conservatives fight for the rights of the unborn yet refuse to provide the right of healthcare for that same child after its birth?
Why are we turning our citizens away from taking life saving medications because they do not have the money to pay for their medications?
Why are we forcing our seniors to cut there medications and take half doses because of the high cost of prescription drugs?
Why is socialized healthcare ok for seniors with Medicare and for veterans through the V.A., yet it is not ok to come up with some type of public option for the millions of hard working Americans whose employers do not offer affordable healthcare insurance to their employees?
Why is it we can afford to kill people in foreign wars but we cannot afford to save lives here at home?
Why do we hide our heads in the sands and deny that our healthcare system is broken?
Sunday, August 30, 2009
Monday, August 17, 2009
Healthcare
It seems like one would have to be living under a rock or lost on a deserted island to not have heard all the chatter going on over healthcare right now. To listen to the Right, one would think that the sky is falling. When watching critics of health care reform screaming on the news or reading letters to the editor, one has to wonder:
Why is the health care industry spending more then 1.4 million a day lobbying Congress?
Ethically speaking, how can we accept the fact that nearly 46 million Americans today are living without any type of health insurance, and 25 million more Americans are underinsured?
Why aren’t they outraged by the fact that healthcare premiums have increased by 120% since 1999, yet wages over the same period have only increased by 29%?
Studies conducted at Harvard University found that 50% of bankruptcy filings were partly the result of medical expenses. This is something that is undeniable; we all know someone whose quality of life is diminished because they can’t afford the care that saved their life. Why do the critics vehemently support a system that is financial death for so many Americans?
Seniors are encouraged to tell the government to stay out of their healthcare and they are happy with their Medicare plans; but don’t they realize that Medicare is a government run socialized healthcare plan? How loud would the roar be if Medicare was done away with and seniors were force to buy all their health care insurance on the open market?
Critics are using scare tactics and lies and because of that we are lynching our political representatives and not the pharmaceutical and medical industries who are making massive profits. They have figured out how to take advantage of the system and victimize us hard working American Citizens. And now that their easy road to wealth to is in jeopardy they are trying to get us to fight their battles for them. They say that with Medicare part A scheduled to be broke by 2017 we need to oppose reform because the government can’t do anything right. That is a ridiculous logical fallacy fueled by the very people and organizations robbing and draining our bank accounts every day. We need to take action and safeguard the program and stop them from draining the funds through exorbitant and unnecessary fees. Healthcare in this country is broken and reform is necessary.
AARP has brought some issues to the table that I feel need to be addressed in any new healthcare plan. Like, guaranteeing access to affordable coverage for Americans age 50-64. With unemployment hovering at 9.5% and older workers losing their jobs and health insurance along with the sky rocketing cost of COBRA, there needs to be some type of safety net in place.
We need to close the Medicare Part D coverage gap or "doughnut hole." How many of you have been caught in the doughnut hole with your prescription coverage and had to pay for the cost of your medicines out of pocket. Something needs to be done to fix this.
Creating a Medicare-transition benefit helps patients safely return to their homes after hospital stays—thus preventing costly hospital readmissions.
AARP is watching the final bill so that it includes increased federal funding and eligibility for home and community-based services through Medicaid, so older Americans can remain in their homes—thus avoiding expensive nursing homes. I would think every senior would be in favor of having the option of having a PCA come to your home and assist you with tasks, so you can live in your own home for as long as possible. Also, it will be creating more jobs and putting people back to work.
In 45 states across the country, insurance companies have the right to discriminate against a people based on their pre-existing conditions when they try to purchase health insurance directly from insurance companies. They can deny you coverage, charge higher premiums, and/or refuse to cover that particular medical condition. That is an unethical status quo that must change.
Lastly, I would like to ask those who do not like the healthcare bill that is being considered in Congress, why they haven’t stepped up with their own healthcare reform bill. It looks like they want to be obstructionists more than doing what is best for the American people. CNN reports quite regularly on the death threats, mobs, and lies that the critics of health care are supporting. This must stop. The violent seas of this debate are confusing those who need to understand it the most. Let’s stop the fear tactics and use maturity in our debates. Our future depends on you.
Why is the health care industry spending more then 1.4 million a day lobbying Congress?
Ethically speaking, how can we accept the fact that nearly 46 million Americans today are living without any type of health insurance, and 25 million more Americans are underinsured?
Why aren’t they outraged by the fact that healthcare premiums have increased by 120% since 1999, yet wages over the same period have only increased by 29%?
Studies conducted at Harvard University found that 50% of bankruptcy filings were partly the result of medical expenses. This is something that is undeniable; we all know someone whose quality of life is diminished because they can’t afford the care that saved their life. Why do the critics vehemently support a system that is financial death for so many Americans?
Seniors are encouraged to tell the government to stay out of their healthcare and they are happy with their Medicare plans; but don’t they realize that Medicare is a government run socialized healthcare plan? How loud would the roar be if Medicare was done away with and seniors were force to buy all their health care insurance on the open market?
Critics are using scare tactics and lies and because of that we are lynching our political representatives and not the pharmaceutical and medical industries who are making massive profits. They have figured out how to take advantage of the system and victimize us hard working American Citizens. And now that their easy road to wealth to is in jeopardy they are trying to get us to fight their battles for them. They say that with Medicare part A scheduled to be broke by 2017 we need to oppose reform because the government can’t do anything right. That is a ridiculous logical fallacy fueled by the very people and organizations robbing and draining our bank accounts every day. We need to take action and safeguard the program and stop them from draining the funds through exorbitant and unnecessary fees. Healthcare in this country is broken and reform is necessary.
AARP has brought some issues to the table that I feel need to be addressed in any new healthcare plan. Like, guaranteeing access to affordable coverage for Americans age 50-64. With unemployment hovering at 9.5% and older workers losing their jobs and health insurance along with the sky rocketing cost of COBRA, there needs to be some type of safety net in place.
We need to close the Medicare Part D coverage gap or "doughnut hole." How many of you have been caught in the doughnut hole with your prescription coverage and had to pay for the cost of your medicines out of pocket. Something needs to be done to fix this.
Creating a Medicare-transition benefit helps patients safely return to their homes after hospital stays—thus preventing costly hospital readmissions.
AARP is watching the final bill so that it includes increased federal funding and eligibility for home and community-based services through Medicaid, so older Americans can remain in their homes—thus avoiding expensive nursing homes. I would think every senior would be in favor of having the option of having a PCA come to your home and assist you with tasks, so you can live in your own home for as long as possible. Also, it will be creating more jobs and putting people back to work.
In 45 states across the country, insurance companies have the right to discriminate against a people based on their pre-existing conditions when they try to purchase health insurance directly from insurance companies. They can deny you coverage, charge higher premiums, and/or refuse to cover that particular medical condition. That is an unethical status quo that must change.
Lastly, I would like to ask those who do not like the healthcare bill that is being considered in Congress, why they haven’t stepped up with their own healthcare reform bill. It looks like they want to be obstructionists more than doing what is best for the American people. CNN reports quite regularly on the death threats, mobs, and lies that the critics of health care are supporting. This must stop. The violent seas of this debate are confusing those who need to understand it the most. Let’s stop the fear tactics and use maturity in our debates. Our future depends on you.
Monday, June 29, 2009
Political Contribution Refund program
If you haven't already heard the Political Contribution Refund program which as citizens contribute to candidates for state office will end on June 30 as part of Gov. Pawlenty's plans to balance the state budget through unallottment.
Let's face the truth , the 10 million dollars that the state will save over the next two years isn't really going to make a dent in the multi-billion dollar deficit were facing. But what it does is it takes the peoples voice out of our government. Many citizens that now give to political party's or to candidates may now think twice in doing so because the refunds will no longer be coming in the mail. That means that special interest groups with deep pockets will be buying there influence in St. Paul. Is this a good thing for the citizens of our state????
But there may be a challenge to this abuse of power by the Governor.
According to the Mpls Star Tribune, Mike Dean, president of Common Cause Minnesota, said Monday that the group has been talking with lawyers and law professors over whether Pawlenty can make his unallotment "We're very concerned about the abuse of power here," Dean said. "We have consulted legal experts to make sure we're correct, but we think there are grounds. We would engage someone who would be injured -- a legislative candidate -- to file the actual lawsuit."
This abuse of power by Gov. Pawlenty needs to be challenged. The peoples voice needs to be kept in our state government.
Let's face the truth , the 10 million dollars that the state will save over the next two years isn't really going to make a dent in the multi-billion dollar deficit were facing. But what it does is it takes the peoples voice out of our government. Many citizens that now give to political party's or to candidates may now think twice in doing so because the refunds will no longer be coming in the mail. That means that special interest groups with deep pockets will be buying there influence in St. Paul. Is this a good thing for the citizens of our state????
But there may be a challenge to this abuse of power by the Governor.
According to the Mpls Star Tribune, Mike Dean, president of Common Cause Minnesota, said Monday that the group has been talking with lawyers and law professors over whether Pawlenty can make his unallotment "We're very concerned about the abuse of power here," Dean said. "We have consulted legal experts to make sure we're correct, but we think there are grounds. We would engage someone who would be injured -- a legislative candidate -- to file the actual lawsuit."
This abuse of power by Gov. Pawlenty needs to be challenged. The peoples voice needs to be kept in our state government.
Friday, June 19, 2009
Paul Thissen
I had the opportunity to chat with Paul Thissen recently who is a candidate for Governor in 2010. After our chat I listen to Paul speak I was impressed to say the least
Here is a person that knows the issues and the hardships facing Minnesotans today
.
Paul understands that stripping away heath care coverage for the poorest Minnesotans is wrong.
Paul realises that Minnesota is growing older and we must make sure that our parents and older neighbors live independently, with dignity and in their community as long as possible.
Paul will keep our focus on Renewable Energy buy keeping Minnesota a leader in “going green.”
My only advise to Mr Thissen would be that he try and get out in rural Minnesota more and listen to the problems we in rural areas of the state are facing .
Here is a link to his Website
Here is a candidate worth watching!!
Saturday, May 30, 2009
DARK AGES
Minnesota is a wonderful state to live and raise a family; I am proud to be a Minnesotan. The world knows that the State of Minnesota does the right thing for all of its citizens, especially those facing economic hardship, and citizens with disabilities. Under the leadership of Governor Tim Pawlenty the world will be disappointed in our great state’s moral leadership. The Governor has reached a new low point with his line-item veto of $381 million of General Assistance Medical Care (GAMC) program in the health and human services bill.
The Governor has killed a program that provides medical care to our poorest Minnesotans, persons with disabilities, and individuals suffering from mental illness. Over 30,000 Minnesotans will be affected by this line-item veto, and in less than a year our Governor will forsake our neighbors, our friends, those we care for, members of our churches, and our communities.
The Democrats in office found a way to keep GAMC for the poor by raising the state income tax for the wealthiest Minnesota by $109.00 a year what that means is that a family earning over $250,000.00 a year would have to pay an extra $2.10 in state income tax every week. $2.10 a week is that too much to ask our wealthiest Minnesotans to pay to make sure that the poorest Minnesotans can receive healthcare services and medications? In these economic times we must ask ourselves, will Governor Pawlenty also forsake us in our greatest time of need?
It is a dark day in Minnesota when the poor and disabled are forced to chose between food and necessary medical visits to their physician. As a result they will only be able to visit the doctor in life or death situations, and sadly by then it will be too late. Who will care for their families then? No one, they will slip into the depths of poverty beyond comprehension. It’s too bad that the Governor feels that the poorest Minnesotans do not deserve to receive preventive healthcare. It is too bad for our state, our community, our churches, and the families that must suffer the consequences of our Governor’s actions.
Are you wondering what is next on the governor’s hit list? History and logic show that it will likely be an all out assault on programs that help care for the elderly such as state funding for Nursing Homes and Group Homes, and on low income individuals and families. Do you have 100% job security? Could you fall in that category someday? State funding for Hospitals has already been talked about that the Albert Lea Medical Center (ALMC) may lose over $4.1 Million in state funding over the next two years. ALMC is an essential part of our community, if that gets hit I doubt that we will be able to recover. How many people do you know that work there? Do you work there? Do you visit a physician there? Are you immune to the ramifications of Governor Pawlenty’s cuts? Please make a stand for what is right and just before it is too late. Stand up for yourself, and stand up for those who cannot defend themselves!
There is no doubt that Tim Pawlenty will leave his mark on the History of Minnesota, and it will be remembered as Minnesota’s DARK AGES.
The Governor has killed a program that provides medical care to our poorest Minnesotans, persons with disabilities, and individuals suffering from mental illness. Over 30,000 Minnesotans will be affected by this line-item veto, and in less than a year our Governor will forsake our neighbors, our friends, those we care for, members of our churches, and our communities.
The Democrats in office found a way to keep GAMC for the poor by raising the state income tax for the wealthiest Minnesota by $109.00 a year what that means is that a family earning over $250,000.00 a year would have to pay an extra $2.10 in state income tax every week. $2.10 a week is that too much to ask our wealthiest Minnesotans to pay to make sure that the poorest Minnesotans can receive healthcare services and medications? In these economic times we must ask ourselves, will Governor Pawlenty also forsake us in our greatest time of need?
It is a dark day in Minnesota when the poor and disabled are forced to chose between food and necessary medical visits to their physician. As a result they will only be able to visit the doctor in life or death situations, and sadly by then it will be too late. Who will care for their families then? No one, they will slip into the depths of poverty beyond comprehension. It’s too bad that the Governor feels that the poorest Minnesotans do not deserve to receive preventive healthcare. It is too bad for our state, our community, our churches, and the families that must suffer the consequences of our Governor’s actions.
Are you wondering what is next on the governor’s hit list? History and logic show that it will likely be an all out assault on programs that help care for the elderly such as state funding for Nursing Homes and Group Homes, and on low income individuals and families. Do you have 100% job security? Could you fall in that category someday? State funding for Hospitals has already been talked about that the Albert Lea Medical Center (ALMC) may lose over $4.1 Million in state funding over the next two years. ALMC is an essential part of our community, if that gets hit I doubt that we will be able to recover. How many people do you know that work there? Do you work there? Do you visit a physician there? Are you immune to the ramifications of Governor Pawlenty’s cuts? Please make a stand for what is right and just before it is too late. Stand up for yourself, and stand up for those who cannot defend themselves!
There is no doubt that Tim Pawlenty will leave his mark on the History of Minnesota, and it will be remembered as Minnesota’s DARK AGES.
Friday, May 8, 2009
The Opener
The 2009 Minnesota Fishing Opener is almost here. I see that the Governor has decided to stay close to home this year and spend the Opener on White Bear Lake which is just a hop, skip and a jump from the Capitol.
So I guess their will be no big kick off in Northern Minnesota for the governor to push the great fishing and pristine lakes up there.
Nor will the Governor be coming to Southern Minnesota to the Shallow fetal lake to push a fishery that is really coming into it own.
So I would like to make a suggestion to the Governor for the 2010 Fishing Opener.
How about coming down to Albert Lea and try fishing Albert Lea Lake?
Here is a little info on this soon to be Walleye destination
According to Hugh Valiant, the Department of Natural Resources' fisheries supervisor for the southern region that includes this lake, there have been some water-quality issues that have been addressed, and now Albert Lea Lake is drastically improving in that regard. While anglers do like to fish lakes where there is some decent visibility and deeper weed growth, their top priority is whether there are fish to be caught.
"We have been stocking walleyes in Albert Lea, and the numbers couldn't be better," Valiant said. "In our last survey, there were 85 walleyes per gill net. And the fish are in great shape."
Valiant explained that growth rates in the southern Minnesota lakes result in quality fishing.
"We have been stocking walleyes in Albert Lea, and the numbers couldn't be better," Valiant said. "In our last survey, there were 85 walleyes per gill net. And the fish are in great shape."
Valiant explained that growth rates in the southern Minnesota lakes result in quality fishing.
"The walleyes in these highly fertile lakes grow fast, and they get big," he said. "This lake has never received the fishing pressure it deserves, but once anglers discover there are a lot of walleyes, that will change."
Albert Lea fits the definition of pothole lake. In its 2,600 acres you'll be hard-pressed to find water over 6 feet deep. With no structure to key on, anglers must use search techniques like trolling crankbaits and casting jigs until they connect with a pod of walleyes, then they drop anchor and pitch out the slip-bobbers.
Albert Lea fits the definition of pothole lake. In its 2,600 acres you'll be hard-pressed to find water over 6 feet deep. With no structure to key on, anglers must use search techniques like trolling crankbaits and casting jigs until they connect with a pod of walleyes, then they drop anchor and pitch out the slip-bobbers.
Just think about it,
The Governor could come here and fish for Walleyes and give Albert Lea a little shot in the arm economically speaking. While he's here he could be taken to the site of the Shell Rock River Dam and get a first hand look at just how bad this dam really is.
Do you think something might get done with replacing the Shell Rock Riber Dam if T-Paw were to get involved?
Do you think T-Paw will come and fish Albert Lea Lake?
I doubt it.
Saturday, April 11, 2009
The Dam
Will the Freeborn County Board of Commissioners ever get around to replacing this dam at the headwaters on the Shell Rock River?That is a question that the Citizens of Freeborn County have wanted answered for quite some time now.
The Jugland dam was constructed by Freeborn county in 1922. In 1958 the Freeborn County Board of Commissioners passed a resolution declaring that the County of Freeborn , turn over a portion of State Aid highway 19 which was no longer needed as a public road to C.D. Palmer as a private road. Nowhere in this resolution does it state the the County of Freeborn is also turning over the ownership of the Jugland dam to C.D. Palmer.
What is said about the dam is this:
Reserving however to the County of Freeborn it agents and invitees, theSo what do these three little words mean access, egress and ingress in the context of the Jugland dam?
right to access to, egress and ingress across said premises to and from
the Jugland dam.
Access: a way or means of approach
Egress: Maintenance and workmanship." Means of egress shall be continually maintained free of all obstructions or impediments to full instant use in the case of fire or other emergency.
Ingress: the right to enter.
The county did state that it retained access to go to and from the dam. Also, through the word egress, it has the right to continually maintain free of all obstructions the Shell Rock River dam.
But as early as the 1960's thing started to get heated when the County started decussions on the over hall of the Shell rock river dam.
In an article in the Albert Lea Tribune of Oct 23 2001 it was stated
that:
State statute stipulates that the owner of a dam constructed before
the
state regulation was applied must maintain and operate the dam in a
manner
approved and prescribed by the Department of Natural Resources
(DNR).
The
state law also demands the state to take over the control of
an abandoned
dam
owned by a private entity.
The county considered either the state or the landowner was to be responsible for the restoration.
But in the state's opinion, the county
retains the possession. A document
issued by State Assistant Attorney General
Matthew B. Seltzer in August
1999 said,
"All of the facts that have been
presented to me indicate
that the dam was
built by a public agency and it
continues to be owned
and controlled by that
public agency."
The county board in October of 2001 asked County Attorney Craig Nelson to conduct a survey to identify the legal owner of the dam and report his finding back to the county board.
Then in the November 11, 2001 story that was printed in the Albert Lea Tribune on the ownership issue of the dam, County attorney Craig Nelson stated:
The document, signed in October 1958 by the chairman of county board, T. C.
Nelson, and County Auditor Robert D. Hanson, says the county would reserve the
right of access to the dam and turn over a portion of old County Road 19 to the
landowner "as a private road or for whatever purposes he chooses that
does not interfere with the operation of the remaining portion of said
County-State Aid Highway No. 19."
County Attorney Craig Nelson added:
"The legal concern is all clear now for the county to start the
project,"
So we have yet to see where it is stated in a government document or in a title or deed of property that the County of Freeborn does not own and does not have control of the Shell rock River dam.
In 2005 funding was attained from the state of Minnesota to go through the Minnesota DNR in the amount of $250,000.00 to go towards replacing the Shell rock river dam.
In January of 2007 in action taken by the Freeborn County Board of Commissioners Stated as reported in the Albert Lea Tribune
The Freeborn County Board of Commissioners voted unanimously Tuesday in favor of a partnership between Freeborn County and the Shell Rock River Watershed District to pursue the building of a dam and bridge. The dam will be on the Shell Rock River at Albert Lea Lake and the bridge to be replaced will be for County Road 19 over the river.
Also in the 2007 Department of Natural resources current dam safty program projected proirity needs listed the Shell Rock river Dam at number 6 on the Priorty list of dams in need of replacing and was funded
So one would think that maybe the County Commissioners might now have there ducks in a row right?
Not by a long shot!
So the Shell rock river watershed set out to Negotiate and purchase the property around the old dam to be used to parking and fishing and to put a public fishing peer for the pubic to fish from.
BUT for what ever reasons the owner had at that time decided to sell his property to another individual.
So in August of 2008 the Shell rock River watershed District vote to proceed with the Bridge dam project: in wishfully thinking by the Albert Lea Tribune it was reported that:
The Albert Lea Lake dam project is finally under way.
The Shell Rock River
Watershed District Tuesday morning approved plans for the Albert Lea Lake dam
project — after a discussion lasting longer than an hour.
The vote was 4 to 3
But as you can see by reading link poviided the new owner had different ideas for the Dam area and ownership of the dam.
So on October 7 2008 the Freeborn County Commissioners at that time on a 3 to 2 vote, voted down the Shell Rock watersheds plan to replace this dam with a variable crest dam under neath a new bridge that is going to replace the bridge you see in the background of the picture above.
So to put it Bluntly
what the Freeborn County Commissioners did was in-fact took the replacement of the Shell rock river Dam our of the hands of the Shell rock River Watershed and Bought this issue, meaning that the Freeborn county commissioners will now make the finial decision on when the dam will be built where it will be built, what type of dam will be built, and if the public will have access to the dam and to the shell rock river at the dam site and below the dam site. the decision this board will make will affect the citizens of Freeborn county for the next 100 years
It also came out in the October 7th meeting that two commissioners had been negotiating a deal with the new owner.
From the Albert Lea tribune article that day after the meeting we see this in there store
Petersen then said the public should know the details of the negotiations
going on between the commissioners and Jensen.
Belshan retorted that Petersen
is asking about land negotiations. Mathiason said all the details are not
ready.
Petersen repeated that people should know what’s going on. Belshan
then spilled some details.
“You’re grabbing something in negotiations and
making it public,” he said.
Belshan then said Jensen would donate land to the
county on the west side of the Shell Rock River for public fishing. He said it
could have picnic tables, and people can reach the dam. He said a new dam might
have decks for fishing atop it.
Mathiason added that there would no parking
lot but the county would seek a wider shoulder on the road. Petersen questioned
the safety of roadside parking and the ability for people to use the river as a
public waterway.“It looks like Greg Jensen has made a deal with you that is not
acceptable to the public and the Shell Rock River Watershed District board,” he
said.
Then on October 9th 2008 there was an article printed in the Albert Lea Tribune where the new Owner of the Land around the Shell rock river dam stated his case
Mr Jensen in this article bring up some issues to which I have some questions
Mr Jensen and Mr Belshan when talking about a small bay next to county road 19 stated in this article that:
"the people have riparian rights to the small bay between County 19 and the present dam.
“They cannot remove this waterway,”
Well riparian right do apply and it give access to the public to all the water of the shell rock river
even to waters below the Dam.
My question is the being that the public has riparian rights does not that mean that Mr Jensen would have to give Safe passage around the Shell rock river dam.
Jensen said the dam is part of the road, and so the dam was turned over; the county only has the right to get there
I will repeat myself again, in the 1958 resolution there is no mention of the county handing over ownership of the dam to anyone. Next
Jensen said the state Department of Natural Resources last summer gave him a permit to repair part of the dam. Because he received the permit, the state recognizes his ownership of the dam, he said.
Not so fast below a picture on the shell rock watershed Website it was stated that Part of the Albert Lea Lake dam washed out in 1997 and was repaired by local residents
Here is a link
Did these people claim ownership of the dam then??? No!
then we have Mr Jensen's demands
He said a new dam needs to have a fixed crest
No Parking lot only parking will be on the side of the road
Jensen said he doesn’t owe anyone access beyond the dam and said he plans to put up a fence to keep people from trespassing beyond the dam.
So what are riparian duty's?
It is the duty of the riparian owners to exercise their rights reasonably, so as not to unreasonably interfere with the riparian rights of others [see Petraborg v. Zontelli, 217 Minn. 536, 15 N.W. 2d 174 (1944)]. They cannot dike off anddrain, or fence off, their part of the waterbody [see Johnson v. Seifert, 257 Minn. 159, 100 N.W. 2d 689 (1960)]. It is a public nuisance and a misdemeanor to “interfere with, obstruct, or render dangerous for passage waters used by the
public” [see Public Nuisance Law, Minnesota Statutes 609.74].
Lastly. Belshan and Jensen on Wednesday said the deal is done except for a few last details. that was on October 8 2008
So where is the deal this article was printed on October 9th 2008 and as of April 11 2009 a deal has still not been reached with Mr. Jensen. That is over 6 monthes and still no deal. the Dam is still in dier need of repair and the time line to use the state funding to replace the jugland dam runs out on July 1 2009.
Can you say good bye to $250,000.00 and say hello to higher property taxes to pay for the new dam
How is that saving the Taxpayers Money???
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)